Drawing as Critical Geographical Method 2
The session recording will be archived on the site until June 25th, 2023
This session was streamed but not recorded
Date: 3/25/2023
Time: 10:20 AM - 11:40 AM
Room: Directors Row J, Sheraton, Plaza Building, Lobby Level
Type: Panel, Hybrid session with both in-person and virtual presenters
Theme: Toward More Just Geographies
Curated Track:
Sponsor Group(s):
Cultural Geography Specialty Group, Qualitative Research Specialty Group, Queer and Trans Geographies Specialty Group
Organizer(s):
Chan Arun-Pina York University
Karen Paiva Henrique University of Amsterdam
Aparna Parikh Pennsylvania State University
Sage Brice Durham University
Felix McNulty Durham University
Chair(s):
Aparna Parikh Pennsylvania State University
Karen Paiva Henrique University of Amsterdam
Description:
Drawing as Critical Geographical Method 2
Keywords: Observational drawing, Creative methods, Qualitative research, Graphic geographies, Trans-disciplinary methods
Sponsors: Cultural Geographies SG, Qualitative Research SG, Feminist Geographies SG, Queer and Trans Geographies SG
Convenors: Chan Arun-Pina, Sage Brice, Karen Paiva Henrique and Aparna Parikh
““Drawing is the opening of form. This can be thought in two ways: opening in the sense of a beginning, departure, origin, dispatch, impetus, or sketching out, and opening in the sense of an availability or inherent capacity. According to the first sense, drawing evokes more the gesture of drawing than the traced figure. According to the second, it indicates the figure’s essential incompleteness, a non-closure or non-totalizing of form”
(Nancy, 2013)
Building on new and recent experimentation in the discipline, this panel brings together practitioners at the intersection of drawing with geographical enquiry to discuss the potentials and pitfalls of this emerging area of practice. How can drawing expand, deepen, and/or redirect current modes of critical geographical inquiry? How is drawing positioned in relation to text and writing? How can the discipline best integrate drawing’s non-binaristic creative-intellectual potential?
While observation and schematic drawing have historically been significant as methods of surveillance and illustration within physical geography (Sackett, 2006), and solicited or guided drawing have become well established as participatory ethnographic methods in human geography and the social sciences (Literat, 2013), relatively little attention has been paid to the possibilities of drawing as an integrated method for first-hand observation, reflection and analysis in geographical fieldwork that treats the “image as an integral component of the inquiry process” (De Cosson and Irwin, 2004). This panel brings together scholars at the forefront of current methodological innovation, with an view to compiling a themed special issue that will help ground and orientate future use of drawing in human geography and beyond.
Contributions will reflect critically on the role of drawing in relation to various aspects of geographical fieldwork and research, including but not limited to the following:
- Observation and fieldwork encounters
- Embedeness, exploration, and discovery
- Researcher positionality and critical reflexivity
- Integration of artistic practice and methodologies
- Vulnerability and knowledge co-production
- Embodied, sensory, and psycho- geographies
- Power and spatial inequality
- Identity and subject-formation
- Speculative methods and futurities
- Process ontologies and non-representational theory
- Posthumanist and decolonial methods
- Graphic methods, comics, and cartoons
- Field and research journaling
- Re-drawing, tracing, and diagramming as analysis
Works cited:
Literat, I. (2013) ‘“A Pencil for your Thoughts”: Participatory Drawing as a Visual Research Method with Children and Youth’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 84–98 [Online]. DOI: 10.1177/160940691301200143.
Nancy, J.-L. (2013) The Pleasure in Drawing (trans. P. Armstrong), New York, Fordham University Press.
Sackett, C. (ed.) (2006) The True Line: The Landscape Diagrams of Geoffrey Hutchings, Axminster, Devon, Colin Sackett.
De Cosson, & Irwin, R. L. (2004). A/r/tography : rendering self through arts-based living inquiry. Pacific Educational Press.
Presentations (if applicable) and Session Agenda:
AAG Tech Support |
Drawing as Critical Geographical Method 2 |
Non-Presenting Participants
Role | Participant |
Panelist | Chan Arun-Pina |
Panelist | Matthew Wilson University of Kentucky |
Panelist | Conor Moloney Queen Mary University of London |
Panelist | Kacy McKinney Portland State University |
Panelist | Chelsea Nestel University of Wisconsin Madison |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing as Critical Geographical Method 2
Description
Type: Panel, Hybrid session with both in-person and virtual presenters
Date: 3/25/2023
Time: 10:20 AM - 11:40 AM
Room: Directors Row J, Sheraton, Plaza Building, Lobby Level
Contact the Primary Organizer
Chan Arun-Pina York University
chanarunnarendra@gmail.com