Use of sUAS imagery for surveying waterfowls in a managed wetland in Colusa County
Topics: Remote Sensing
, Drones
, Environmental Science
Keywords: sUAS imagery, waterfowl survey, wetland, OBIA
Session Type: Virtual Poster
Day: Saturday
Session Start / End Time: 4/10/2021 03:05 PM (Pacific Time (US & Canada)) - 4/10/2021 04:20 PM (Pacific Time (US & Canada))
Room: Virtual 52
Authors:
Kaitlyn Hernandez, Humboldt State University
Judson Fisher, Humboldt State University
Katherine Marlin, Humboldt State University
Alex Pickering, Humboldt State University
Luke Scaroni, Humboldt State University
Ariel Weisgrau, Humboldt State University
Buddhika Madurapperuma, Humboldt State University
Sharon Kahara, Humboldt State University
James Lamping, Humboldt State University
,
Abstract
Recent advances in small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) have facilitated monitoring and counting waterfowl using object based image analysis (OBIA) in remote sensing. The objective of the study is to use a semi-automated workflow to extract waterfowls from a managed wetland in Colusa County, California. Over 560 sUAS imagery was obtained using a DJI Mavic 2 PRO at an average Ground Sample Distance of 3 cm/px. Nine ground control points were placed across the study area and the coordinates were recorded using a Real-Time Kinematic GPS. An orthomosaic image was created using the Agisoft Photoscan software and the image was smoothed using a low pass filter to prevent over segmentation. Training points of waterfowl were manually created and then ENVI Segmentation only workflow was used to extract waterfowl objects, using the Edge algorithm at a scale of 75% and merge algorithm at a level of 95%. Two subsets of waterfowl present (6.8 ha) and waterfowl absent (1.4 ha) were used for OBIA. Rule-based feature extraction workflow in ENVI was used to classify two data subsets. The total automated waterfowl count was 2,259. The overall classification accuracy for identifying birds was 57.3%. The user's accuracy for birds and non-birds was 93.9% and 51.5% and producer’s accuracy for birds and non-birds was 23.6% and 98.1% respectively. The greatest misclassification had visually similar grass patches in shallow water, or areas without birds. Conducting automated and manual counts in defined habitat may overcome the challenge.